Teachers in Kazakhstan
Kazakhnomad has a series of interesting pieces up on teaching and teachers in Kazakhstan. She did a survey of students, teachers and people who have studied abroad on their opinions about how education should be and also had some teachers write essays about why they are teachers and how they can help their country. If you start with this post on the survey results, and keep reading up to the present, you’ll hit all the posts.
One major theme of this little series is how to change the attitude of teachers and students from teacher-centered instruction methods to student-centered methods. Personally when I work with teachers, I find that most of them want to change their teaching styles but they literally do not know how to. No one has ever told them. The teacher’s colleges still teach the old traditional methods of drilling, memorizing and making students feel stupid. Amazingly enough, a lot of them teach in schools that are too cheap to buy the teacher’s edition of textbooks–which tend to have lots of teaching methodologies and suggestions for diverse ways to approach the subject matter. So the first problem is just that teachers don’t know how to teach in a way oriented to the students.
Another problem is that teachers tend to teach the way they were taught. That is, teachers remember what our past teachers were like and teach in the same way because they feel that that is what being a teacher means. So it’s a cyclical problem. Our future teachers are learning in a very strict, controlled and teacher-oriented classroom meaning that they will also construct their classrooms in the same way. Until teachers learn how to give students autonomy and focus less on grading and more on educating, future teachers won’t embrace these new ideas.
Also, the fact is that a lot of decisions for education in this country are made at the Ministry of Education in Astana. The system is still very centralized and closely controlled. Textbooks are ordered and designed by the Ministry, hiring practices are also centralized as is the syllabus and accreditation of schools. So we need to educate the policymakers too. Otherwise they create systems in which teachers have no room to inspire students or adjust to different learning styles.
Finally, we need to hire more teachers and raise their salaries. Why? Many teachers don’t make enough money to live on. So they have to get other jobs (some of them write papers for students for money) or take bribes. Meaning they don’t have enough time to work a full day as a teacher, work their second job and read up on the latest teaching methodologies. In fact, some teachers need to work both shifts of the school day (8am-1:30pm and 1:45-7 or 8pm). These teachers don’t even have time to plan their lessons. I know one young teacher who says that she never knows what she is going to teach until she walks into the room and opens the textbook. Of course she is unable to go off the book or incorporate more creative ways to teach the subject matter. There’s no time. So teachers need to be guaranteed a living wage so that they have free time to improve themselves. Related to this, I don’t think universities here teach non-degree classes or continuing ed. It’s be nice if there were some seminars or short-term classes teachers could take to improve their teaching without having to go back and study full-time for a graduate degree.
So those are my thoughts on teaching in Kazakhstan. Be sure to look at Kazakhnomad’s as well.
KZBlog, I appreciate your cogent thoughts on education in Kazakhstan. You underline very well what I already know about the sad realities here for teachers. Good to compare notes and do what we can to help alleviate this dismal situation for ALL involved in education on ALL levels.
When I was in graduate school, an elderly teacher I had in some education course made this salient point I’ll never forget (I can’t remember anything else about the course). Good economy = good education and Bad economy = bad education.
Therefore, if KZ wants to be a part of the top 50 developed countries in the world in the next 20 years, then proof of that would be in having good education, good teachers, good products of that system and thus better economy because there are smarter people running it.
Since I’m married to an American economist I know that KZ still has a planned economy mentality instead of a market economy mindset. Seems a very vicious cycle to get out of unless KZ students coming back from being western trained can break the glass ceiling and share what they have learned. Seems though that the older people in power will not relent their reigns and the younger voices will not be heeded so readily.
All this takes time and the will and drive of the Kazakh people to change. Investing money into the schools and helping the KZ teachers I think will help speed up the long term effects that are needed. Thanks again for directing traffic to my blog.
The connection between the economy and education is very important. And one issue, in my opinion, is that the government still plays such a large role in business and society. And even private companies are run hierarchically. So often middle management is just carrying out orders. Even if they are well-educated, they have no room to be independent or think. I suspect there will need to be a huge paradigm shift. Maybe the best thing Western educated students can bring back for now is just the attitudes of student empowerment, decentralization, and critical thought.
We expect Kazakhstan students educated with western and eastern system, let them work for kazakhstan econemy and education, expect a collision, expect an evolution, but not more revolution, we kazakhstanee need stablized sociaty, not need invervien!
So what’s your plan on bringing people back to work in KZ after receiving the western education? Brain drain will continue being a huge problem until each generation of leaders are replaced by ones who are slightly less corrupt. If this is what you mean by evolution, I completely agree, but I don’t think it’ll happen in my lifetime.
I don’t mean that students studying abroad should bring revolution. I mean that the knowledge they gain (especially at the bachelor’s level) is probably not nearly as important as some of the ideas they will bring back. Such as, if teachers run classrooms based on fear students will not learn as well. Or that a well-educated person should not specialize in any one subject but have a broad education.
Each students study over board, should focus on a point, to be the expert in that area, and knowledge, more cultivated, more powerful, it is also the target of the kazakh culture site, i.e., http://www.bulakh.colm, that will be a virtual culture & science & technology center and school.