The School System Explained
Nice post on the Kazakhstani School System I came across the other day.
Key points that would be interesting to foreigners (or even things I hadn’t quite figured out!):
- Most schools have two sessions of classes- Half the student study in the morning and half the students study in the afternoon. This is because there aren’t enough classrooms or schools for students to study at the same time. Thus the school day is shorter than in the US, but teachers, who teach both morning and afternoon sessions, work 10 hour days
- Students are divided by grade level but also by section. These sections are determined by a test they take in year 1. The top students go into section A, the next group goes into B and the kids with the lowest results go into G or E group. So their intelligence is determined in 1st grade and they will be stuck labeled their whole school careers on the basis of this one test!
- There is really no punishment in Kazakhstani schools. No detention, because the building is in use all day for classes. All you can do is yell at the students [which they get immune to pretty quickly-KZBlog]. So students are crazy in the hallways, talk and fight in class, and generally show low discipline [Telling them that African or Uzbek or Indian students are better disciplined or that you can see from their behavior that Borat was right about Kazakhstan being an uncivilized country, generally shames them enough for them to be good for a week or so–KZBlog
- Students are typically graded every day or every other day. These grades are often subjective based on some oral answer or behavior in class, so the teacher never has to (or often is able to) justify his or her grading policy.
So that’s some food for thought. Dear Kazakhstani, do you have anything to add, or any corrections to make?
1. author of the article was working in village school, so some facts are not really applicable for schools in Almaty for example.
2. sections based on test? well, may be smthg has changed very recently. i don’t remember any tests, and believe me, we had very different kids in our class with different level of intelligence, discipline and interest. but within class we indeed had labeling – “good” and “bad” (labels were given first of all based on how disciplined and well-behaving kid was). and unfortunately teachers (very often) are more loyal to “good” students.
3. teachers can say better, but i was always under impression that they don’t work all 10-12 h. they need to work certain amount of hours a week. plus they have some additional responsibilities (like being curator, or in case of elementary school so called prolonged hours)
4. ENT – well, i believe that decision to introduce ENT was one of the biggest mistakes. typically last quarter if not half a year students don’t really study, they get ready for ENT = get copies of questionnaires from previous years and just go thru those tests again and again. so “teaching is geared by ENT” – it’s bullshit.
The ENT (School leaving exam that basically determines whether kids can go on to university or not and which university they go to, how much grant or loan money they get for university, etc..), at least the ENT in English, is ridiculous. I’ve gone through previous year exams and you don’t have to know any English to pass it, just some basic rules of grammar. I had students who got over 100 on the ENT despite not being able to formulate a sentence in English correctly because they just memorize the 10 or 20 points of grammar the test always covers.
Furthermore, the test is full of questions that have two or more right answers. The readings and sometimes the questions themselves have grammatical errors in them. And then there are random questions like, “When was the Great Fire of London?” What does that have to do with knowledge of the English language? No idea if the other subject tests are as bad, but the ENT in English needs serious work.
Thank goodness for the international schools here in Astana! I should also add that my daughters teacher worked in an Astana public school for three months and was paid $500 a month. And she was paid higher than the regular teachers because of her western training and English language. Yikes. That doesn’t even cover one weeks trip to the grocery store here.
$500 on one week’s trip to the grocery store? Sounds like someone is shopping exclusively in Ramstore 🙂
Interesting post, I’ve added it to the growing list of “really must link to that soon” entries 🙂